哪位高人能对APPLE的PowerBoo [复制链接]

那也只能吸引一个MM的眼睛啊，嘻嘻。

呵呵，你会发现你要教会她用操作系统需要近1个月

而她越来越烦

干脆不用了

所以说，吸引也需要移动，哈哈。

Apple 的iBook是米囯的流行機種，不過因爲軟件的緣故，在國内比較不知名。而在國内能夠用到最多的就是与圖形、圖像有密切關係的行業了。所以幾乎成了行業用機的代表。實際上MAC系的機器在軟件方面在國外是非常多的。尤其是個人軟件和家用軟件以及輔助教學軟件。在米囯的中小學，絕大多數用的都是iBOOK，這種機器的造型深受小朋友的喜歡。

iBOOK還有iMAC已經不是幾年前的 MAC 系下的設計理念了，它已經融入更多的PC元素，比如通用的PCI總綫接口技術、標準的US PC鍵盤指位。當然PC也向MAC體系借鑑了很多：可通用的DIMM接口標準、USB接口規範。可以說基本上兩者都在互相學習互相融合。目前來看唯一不能融合的就是OS了。雖然MacOS是GUI 交互理念的鼻祖了，但是PC自從進入WIN（還包括類WIN界面體系）時代後也開始了相互的學習過程。

目前能夠跨越兩大平臺（但内核是不同的）的軟件，主要還是集中在圖形、圖像、以及音頻處理方面，至於網絡瀏覽器，雖然同一公司會有應用于不同OS的版本，但是差別代大，不做討論了。
因爲上述類別的軟件在適用性和實際表現方面在MacOS下確實表現出色，結果引入國内市場後，幾乎成了專業工作的象徵，以至於被打上了行業的烙印。

事實上MAC系的機型在很早以前就超越了PC，不論是CPU主頻還是顯示單元以及内部總綫的數度表現方面。也正是這個原因，才使得MAC系在需要耗用大量系統資源的應用領域有如此出色的表現。

最後要說的是MAC系對時尚的引領，MAC自從推出iMAC和iBOOK之後，那種透明的水晶外殼和渾圓的曲綫設計，就被衆多產品效仿。這種痕跡不但出現在其他科技產品如行動電話、PDA、電視機上面。連PC的零部件廠商也開始效法。這幾乎一經成爲所有高科技產品時尚化和前衛的標簽，也成爲 i  時代的象徵。

谢谢你对苹果机的一番评论，不知还有没有针对苹果刚出的这款机器的使用心得，我比较有兴趣。

最初由 天狼心 发布 Apple 的iBook是米囯的流行機種，不過因爲軟件的緣故，在國内比較不知名。而在國内能夠用到最多的就是与圖形、圖像有密切關係的行業了。所以幾乎成了行業用機的代表。實際上MAC系的機器在軟件方面在國外是非常多的。尤其是個人軟件和家用軟件以及輔助教學軟件。在米囯的中小學，絕大多數用的都是iBOOK，這種機器的造型深受小朋友的喜歡。 iBOOK還有iMAC已經不是幾年前的 MAC 系下的設計理念了，它已經融入更多的PC元素，比如通用的PCI總綫接口技術、標準的US PC鍵盤指位。當然PC也向MAC體系借鑑了很多：可通用的DIMM接口標準、USB接口規範。可以說基本上兩者都在互相學習互相融合。目前來看唯一不能融合的就是OS了。雖然MacOS是GUI 交互理念的鼻祖了，但是PC自從進入WIN（還包括類WIN界面體系）時代後也開始了相互的學習過程。 目前能夠跨越兩大平臺（但内核是不同的）的軟件，主要還是集中在圖形、圖像、以及音頻處理方面，至於網絡瀏覽器，雖然同一公司會有應用于不同OS的版本，但是差別代大，不做討論了。 因爲上述類別的軟件在適用性和實際表現方面在MacOS下確實表現出色，結果引入國内市場後，幾乎成了專業工作的象徵，以至於被打上了行業的烙印。 事實上MAC系的機型在很早以前就超越了PC，不論是CPU主頻還是顯示單元以及内部總綫的數度表現方面。也正是這個原因，才使得MAC系在需要耗用大量系統資源的應用領域有如此出色的表現。 最後要說的是MAC系對時尚的引領，MAC自從推出iMAC和iBOOK之後，那種透明的水晶外殼和渾圓的曲綫設計，就被衆多產品效仿。這種痕跡不但出現在其他科技產品如行動電話、PDA、電視機上面。連PC的零部件廠商也開始效法。這幾乎一經成爲所有高科技產品時尚化和前衛的標簽，也成爲 i  時代的象徵。

你是那里人？？？台湾的？？？怎么用繁体？？看着真难受！

偶一直用繁體字的，dnsk不覺得麽？看著難受是因爲你看慣簡體字了，有機會多看看繁體字吧，有益身心健康，哈哈哈哈

:D :D

最初由 dnsk 发布 你是那里人？？？台湾的？？？怎么用繁体？？看着真难受！

这个我倒是知道，只是就像你说的，实在不习惯！
不过也没什么！

有人这样说:


If you were wondering why so many people hate macs and so many were fanitacial about them as well, I will offer my opinion.

I cant stand macs because:
They change the architecture too often. Cards made for PC's in 1983 will still work with a modern PC and the same with software. But if you made the mistake of buying a mac then they drop the model a few months or a year later and introduce something totally new, something that has a different chip, different instruction set, and will not run the same software. It is no wonder companies come out with mac software late or not at all, why bother putting 1000hrs into a product when mac can arbitrarily change their systems and make the market for your software almost disappear. Case In Point: Imac, again a total change, this one to save the company, but right after that they come out with ANOTHER model, the G3, that is not compatible with the Imac. Now that you have one of these Imac things, you want to give your neighbor a document you realize there is no floppy drive, you now have to email it to him or buy another piece of hardware(floppy/zip..). Instead of picking a good design and improving it they want to re-engineer the whole thing every time, with the PC they took a crappy design and massaged it, 8bit ISA -> 16Bit ISA -> VESA -> PCI and adjusted some other things until we have the Pentium II which works at least.

Recently Mac announced yet another change, they are finally scrapping the buggy macOS and replacing it with FreeBSD unix, they are going to put a fake front end on it to make it look like the old MacOS but it will actually be Unix.
Have you ever wondered why there are two major programs to emulate PC's and Windows on a Mac but the couple for a PC to run MACOS are free? No one needs to run Mac software if they have a PC but everyone with a Mac needs to run PC software.

I saw on the news where the US Govt is not allowing export of the G4. Mac people love to wave that around, how the G4 is too powerful, but I remember not too long ago it was not legal to export a 40mhz 386. Hmmm.

Another reason to hate mac is just because mac users are so fanitacial about them. They refuse to acknowledge that there are shortcommings and that the PC can do as well as a mac even when confronted with the facts. They always cite how Windows locks up and has to be rebooted, but based on my experience macs lockup even more often and require more memory just to run. It is like a Macintosh cult, reminds me of the old commodore 64 cults, they thought the c64 was great and wouldnt use an XT, who has a C64 today?

And the Number One reason I hate Macs: I would never trust an operating system that does not have a command prompt! For people that dont know what they are doing a windows only interface is fine but for those that have a clue we need to get things done fast, down and dirty, so why are we restricted to a slow mouse-limited interface? Who would design an operating system that you cannot boot off of a floppy anyway?

总算看完了，好累！Thank you！谁还能发表一篇日文版的文章啊？这样的话就比较齐全了，简体、繁体、英文、日文。呵呵，不错。